Monday 20 May 2013

The Prince of Wales Baths


‘By the side of the silvery sea’: The Prince of Wales Swimming Baths.

The lyrics to one of Britain’s most popular music hall songs proclaim that Victorians and Edwardians of all social-classes aspired to ‘spend their summer's holiday, down beside the side of the silvery sea.’ This paper examines the consumption of Ornamental Swimming as a popular form of entertainment for Victorian holiday-makers to Lancashire’s premier seaside holiday-resort of Blackpool. Billed as the ‘The Greatest Swimming Show in the Universe’, the privately-owned Prince of Wales Swimming Baths entertained its customers for sixteen summer seasons from 1881-1896.  The baths was a significant addition to the resorts attractions and totally in keeping with the towns mission to cater for their visitors ‘health, pleasure and recreation’. The very existence of such a facility reflected the expanding variety of specialist acts displaying their aquatic sporting prowess within the world of popular entertainment. All of the nation’s champion swimmers of the period had exhibited at the baths during their professional careers, performing aquatic feats to audiences who had an insatiable appetite to be entertained by both risky and risqué performances.
             This paper examines the consumption of Ornamental Swimming as a popular form of entertainment for Victorian holiday-makers to Lancashire’s premier seaside holiday-resort of Blackpool. Billed as the ‘The Greatest Swimming Show in the Universe’, the privately-owned Prince of Wales Swimming Baths entertained its customers for sixteen summer seasons from 1881-1896. The very existence of such a facility poses a number of intriguing questions:
1.     Why did the Baths command such a prominent position amongst Blackpool’s numerous pleasure palaces? It was built in 1881 between the North Pier (1863) and the Central Pier (1868). A consortium of Preston businessmen had decided to build the baths to add to the hotel and variety theatre they already owned on that same block of land. The baths provision was most certainly a financial venture.
 
2.     Did it signify a move away from sea-bathing to closed-water bathing as a popular recreational activity? The ‘popularity’ of sea-bathing was perhaps always questionable and the growing provision of swimming and/or bathing facilities within a safer environment popularised the ‘art of swimming’.

3.     What role had the baths and washhouses movement assumed in the life of Lancashire’s mill-town workers during this period? The provision of Baths and Washhouses by local authorities’ circa-1880 was growing apace within Lancashire. For every swimming baths there existed at least one swimming club.
 
4.     To what extent had the ‘art of swimming’ become a form of entertainment? Swimming clubs were compelled to not only provide races at their galas that were ‘open’ for professionals to compete in but to also provide other entertainments for the spectators. An exhibition of ornamental swimming allowed the professional swimmers to be paid for the exhibition rather than for the open race. The swimming club galas proved to be of great financial benefit to both the club and the local Corporation.

5.     How important was ‘ornamental swimming’ in the struggle for emancipation of working-class females? The popularity of young female ornamental swimmers guaranteed its status as did the dangerous and often mystical nature of their performances at a time when most people could not swim.

            The tableau’s that adorned the promenade entrance to the Prince of Wales Baths are clearly designed to entice the passer-by into the Baths where they were assured to have ‘Fun’. Segregation was not based upon being ‘Male’ or ‘Female’; neither was it a question of being a 1st, 2nd or even 3rd class bather. The allegorical messages contained within the semiotic images ‘hint’ of risky and risqué performances by females in ‘official costumes’. The subliminal messages are cleverly aimed at a predominantly working-class clientele largely from the industrial heartland of Lancashire. A visit to a ‘water show’ produced an eclectic mix of customers for a whole variety of reasons; perhaps the dangerous feats performed, or the predominance of scantily clad female natationists or even the cost of yet another form of variety entertainment at the seaside – all for just 6d.  Whilst the tableau’s were effective in drawing-in the ‘punters’ on the promenade in 1888 a seller of photographs of ‘actresses’ was being arrested by the police on Bank-Hey Street, which runs parallel to the promenade and also offered a second entrance to the Baths. This was by no means an isolated incident and serves to illustrate a stark difference in Victorian attitudes towards the amount of flesh that could be revealed by female performers before offending public decency.

            A police officer had considered that some of the pictures on sale by the hawker were indecent and ‘not fit to be exhibited in the public street’. The measure of moral decency appears to be based upon the fact that there were no photographs of statues. It was the officers considered opinion that the pictures were ‘improper and would tend to injure the morals of the people’. The court found the defendant guilty with the option of paying a 40-shillings fine or 28 days in prison. The defendant did ask the court if the Chief Constable could tell him in future which photographs he may sell and the Chief Constable promised to do so. The tableaus on display at the Baths Promenade entrance were to stay in place until the baths closed in 1896.


            This photograph is a visual testimony to a specific moment in time and place that provides the observer with the potential to interpret the consumption of Ornamental Swimming as a popular form of entertainment in Blackpool. The Prince of Wales Baths provides the context for the historiography of swimming as established in the new leisure world and the role of the leisure entrepreneur in satisfying the insatiable appetite of Lancashire’s Lads and Lassies to be entertained. The tableaus provide an opportunity to debate the role of female natationists in an activity that provided the spectator with a curious mix of physically demanding feats performed by those prepared to expose their bodies in a way that sat on that most delicate of see-saws called Victorian respectability. 
 
            Billed as the ‘The Greatest Swimming Show in the Universe’, the privately-owned Prince of Wales Baths entertained its customers for sixteen summer seasons from 1881-1896.  The baths was a significant addition to the resorts attractions and was totally in keeping with the towns mission to cater for their visitors ‘health, pleasure and recreation’. The growth of Public Baths and Washhouses within Lancashire’s hinterland from 1870 onwards had ensured that the typical visitor to Blackpool now had a general knowledge of ornamental swimming as experienced at their local baths and variety theatres. Blackpool attempted to give their visitors what they were used to at home, but only bigger and better!

            At the Prince of Wales Baths the spectator was treated to a ‘water show’ designed to intoxicate the customer with daring and dangerous aquatic feats performed by some of the nation’s best exponents of ornamental swimming. All of the countries ‘champion swimmers’ from 1881-1896 had performed at ‘The Sight of Blackpool’. The baths had the facilities commonly found in most public baths in Lancashire: a large swimming pool for males, a smaller pool for females, private slipper baths and a Turkish bath. However, that was where the similarities ended as the baths was predominantly for water shows; when the season was in full swing opportunities for public swimming reduced as the number of daily performances increased.
 
            The leading aquatic entertainers who ‘topped-the-bill’ were made up of a small group of elite performers who were variously described in the publicity material as:
 
‘The champion of champions’ (Joey Nuttall);
‘The champion all-round swimmer of the world’ (Professor James Finney);
‘The heroine of London Bridge’ (Mary Finney);
‘The champion lady swimmers of the world (The Sisters Johnson);
The greatest scientific and ornamental lady swimmer in the Universe’ (Miss Hermione)
 
The common denominator was that they had stood at the head of their profession as competitive speed or long-distance swimmers and had moved into ornamental swimming as a means of earning a steady but lucrative living. This was of particular significance to the working-class female performers as it provided them with an income of their own whilst also providing positive role models for other females to follow.

             An account of the entertainments on offer at the Baths in June, 1886 is provided by “Nemo” in the Birmingham Chronicle. Nemo describes how he ‘had the pleasure of witnessing the opening performance of the season’ on Whit Monday in 1886. The entertainment began with an ‘overture on the piano’, followed by the acrobat Mons. Ruri who, ‘executed with much gracefulness and remarkable ease, a number of difficult feats’. He was performing on the ‘invisible wire’ and the ‘high trapeze’. This act was followed by the first swimmer, Mademoiselle Le Grande who dived into the water at one end of the swimming pool and swam the full length under water, a distance of 107 feet (32.6 meters). She was then joined by the rest of the troupe of swimmers who proceeded to perform ‘exhibitions of ornamental and scientific swimming’. Nemo suggests that Mdlle, Le Grande was an ‘accomplished young lady who ‘executed almost as many feats in the “briny” as a gymnast could perform on the stage.’ She was then joined by a child-performer whose stage name was ‘Little Lottie’, - ‘the floating wonder’ – who ‘exhibited some really clever tricks in addition to floating on the surface of the water in a manner so graceful and natural as to win for herself continued applause.’ 
 
            The next artiste to perform was Professor James Finney who was described as an ‘amphibious king’. The spectators were said to have ‘enthusiastically received’ Finney in great anticipation of his performance as he was considered to ‘stand at the head of his profession, and his feats are simply astounding.’ He started by giving an imitation of a novice swimmer learning how to swim which was described as being ‘screamingly funny’ keeping the audience in ‘roars of laughter.’ However, the account informs its readers that Finney is most admired for his scientific and ornamental swimming:

He swims under water, with both feet and hands tied, the whole length of the bath. He swims with both feet out of the water. He swims like a fish, like a crab, dives, swims, and revolves like a seal, swims on one side, without the use of his arms, remains under water until you think he will never come up again, and in a word, performs such marvellous feats as “must be seen to be believed”.

Accompanying Professor Finney was Miss Blanche Hermione, who is lauded for her performance thus:

There is nothing this young lady cannot do in the water, she is, without exception the most accomplished lady swimmer I have ever seen, and when I tell you that her feats cover a wide range, from waltzing in the water, to diving head first into it from the balcony above, you will be able to form some conception of Miss Hermione’s ability.

            The entertainment is then brought to an end with an ‘Aquatic Derby’, which Nemo declares to be ‘the most side-splitting farce ever seen in a bath.’ The pantomime is described as involving four ‘hobby horses’ that had been named after prominent politicians of the day: Gladstone, Salisbury, Chamberlain and Parnell.  The jockeys of such steeds attempt to race across the bath but invariably fall off on numerous occasions due to the instability of their horses and because of the inevitable collisions that occur in such a confined space. We are assured that such happenings ‘cause the race to be one of excitement as well as of extreme merriment.’
            The success of the aquatic farce as a finale to the entertainment was subsequently developed into a series of pantomimes whose themes would be changed each season by the shows proprietor, Mr William Henry Broadhead. The water pantomime was variously called ‘an aquatic farce’ or ‘a laughable burlesque’ with such titles as:

1.     On the Ship Canal.
2.     The Warriors Adventures.
3.     McGinty Among the Cannibals.
4.     A Swim for a Wife.

Nemo concludes his description with a comment on the show’s propriety by assuring his readers that:

… all the swimmers are attired in beautiful costumes, which are the pink of modesty, you will see how well this amusing and instructive entertainment is adapted for ladies and children, as well as for the up-grown sterner sex. To recommend such an institution is a pleasure.

            The dangerous nature of some of the performances can be illustrated by a fatal accident that occurred in 1888. On Monday, July 16, the trapeze artist, William Walker of Hulme in Manchester, better known as ‘Bravo’ had a fall during a practice session at the baths. Fellow professional gymnast,  ‘Voltyne’, real name Edwin Bent, said that they were performing on the triple aerial horizontal bars and flying trapeze during the rehearsal when, attempting a double somersault Walker landed on his head in the safety net and broke his neck.
The account of the accident to the Coroner by Voltyne and his subsequent actions require no further comment from me:

He [Bravo] turned once and a half round instead of twice, which brought him on his head. I heard him make a noise, and immediately ran into the net. He had turned over on his back and I put my feet against his shoulders and pulled his head. I heard a crack, which I think was behind the neck. His chin was upon his chest. Before I pulled his head back he appeared to be chocking.

The jury returned a verdict of ‘accidental death’.

             The use of a swimming baths was not always a safer option especially if you could not swim; the combination of cold water and inexperience in the art of swimming often proved fatal. Such a case occurred at the Baths on Tuesday, August 24, 1883 when John Lowe of Hyde, Cheshire took a ‘dip’ in the baths. The Coroner’s inquest highlighted a series of health and safety issues that were avoidable and most certainly would not have been tolerated today. The deceased had attended the water show given by Professor Finney on the Tuesday afternoon; emboldened by the performances, Lowe decided to take a swim after the show as was common practice by some spectators. With no life guards to observe the ‘swimmers’ Lowe drowned within 6 minutes of entering the cold, murky sea-water.
            The consumption of Ornamental Swimming as a popular form of entertainment was not limited to a visit to the sea-side. The best exponents of the art had established themselves as performers of some note who could command prominent billing at a variety of local, national and even international venues: in water shows, swimming galas, Variety Theatres, at the sea-side, or in rivers and lakes. Most of the female performers began their careers as members of a family act but as their popularity and fame grew many would perform under their own names. A summer- season in Blackpool would be lucrative and help establish an aquatic act on the swimming circuit. The proprietor of the Prince of Wales Baths would employ ornamental swimmers in his various variety theatres throughout Lancashire to perform on stage in glass tanks. The North Pier, predominantly for the working-classes, was also a major venue for ornamental swimmers either on stage or in the waters off the pier.

            By 1894 the popularity of ornamental swimming was waning as a form of entertainment. As audiences became all too familiar with the art of swimming so its ability to entertain diminished. This was further complicated by the opening of the Blackpool Tower Aquatic and Variety Circus on the next block to the Baths. By 1896 most of the elite performers were appearing at both venues on short-term contracts. From the 1897 season The Tower Circus dominated the provision of water shows in Blackpool but only as a finale to the circus performances. The use of The Tower’s water tank continues to the present day.
            At the end of the 1896 season the Prince of Wales Baths closed its doors for the very last time. The site was bought by the Blackpool Tower Company who demolished it in 1897 to make way for the Palace Theatre. Thus, sounded the death-knell of ornamental swimming as an art form in Blackpool, the ‘Brighton of the North’. Most of the elite performers had used the Baths as a focal point for their activities as variety act performers; they would venture forth to perform as speed or distance swimmers in exhibition or challenge races throughout the country and even in Europe and North America. The discipline of ornamental swimming was essentially a family affair that could be exhibited both at local swimming galas and on the variety theatre stage. Just as the new leisure world provided an opportunity for the art of swimming to flourish and grow so did the efforts of the Amateur Swimming Association eventually cut off its life-blood within the nation’s local swimming clubs.

Sunday 1 July 2012


Miss Florrie Tilton

            In 1911 Miss Florrie Tilton, a lady with entrepreneurial flair was living at the Barton Street Baths in Gloucester, with her mother and father who were the superintendents of the establishment. Florrie had succeeded in turning her exhibitions of natation for the local swimming club into a profitable business; thus, she had progressed from local performer to professional aquatic artiste. The family had moved from Salford in Lancashire in about 1906 in order for Frank and Louisa Tilton to take up their posts at the Barton Street Baths. By 1911 the National Census declares twenty year-old Florrie to be a ‘professional swimmer’.[1] Florrie had had a picture postcard of herself taken in order to sell copies to spectators at her exhibitions.
            The written comment by one purchaser of a postcard demonstrates not only the entertainment value of ornamental swimming but also the special status such exhibitors had in the eyes of the public. A public, who generally could not swim as was the case with the owners of this card. The card reads:

Dear Rhoda,
In one of your letters you told us you could swim, we are so shameful to hear of it. There are some large swimming baths here, and we went to see this girl swim, it was last summer she was so clever, and we are sending you the program for you to see what she did. Bertie tells us he can swim; it must be lovely we think.[2]




[1] Tilton, Florence, RG14PN15288 RG78PN925 RD325 SD2 ED8 SN153, 1911 Census Household Transcript.
[2] The postcard is undated but it would suggest that Florrie was exhibiting within the Gloucester and Bristol area c1910.

Miss Annie Luker

            It was possible for professional female swimmers to come from the supporting acts to prominence. On Saturday, January 20, 1894 Miss Annie Luker went up in the world in more ways than one when she performed a high dive into the whale tank at the Royal London Aquarium. Such a feat by a female was a great novelty and, as a consequence she was rewarded with a considerable pay rise. Previously she had been employed as a professional lady swimmer with Captain Boyton’s Water Show on an income of just one-pound per week. Annie’s new role as a diver at the London Aquarium provided her with a significant pecuniary reward of £20 per week ‘in emulation of the male divers at the aquarium’.[1] The pay rise was significant in that it not only made Annie a relatively wealthy young lady but, perhaps more importantly, she provided a role model for other young ladies. A reporter from the Penny Illustrated Paper in 1897 was of the opinion that with the large number of ‘well appointed swimming baths’ in most of the major towns, combined with the ladies-only lessons now being made available, meant that it was now inexcusable that our girls should ‘remain ignorant of swimming.’[2] It was suggested that females in London should go and see Miss Luker in order to behold her wonderful skill in the water and attempt to emulate her.[3]
            Annie was described as ‘a plucky girl, whose venturesome nature led her to perform a too-dangerous feat’ that day at the Royal Aquarium in that she had ‘flung herself from a terrific height’. She had gain entry into a professional career in swimming in common with most males and females at the time by displaying her talent for speed or long-distance swimming. Annie was said to have been a regular long-distance swimmer in the River Thames which had eventually led to her appointment as ‘one of the graceful swimmers’ at Captain Boyton’s Water Show.  This new venture of high diving had the result of propelling Annie into a different social-class both in terms of her new-found fame but also in terms of her earning potential. An income of £20 per-week provided her with a comparative spending power in 2005 of £1,198 per-week which illustrates not only just how dangerous the dive would have been but also provided her with financial security. The Penny Illustrated Paper and Illustrated Times was of the opinion that ‘the performance is too perilous for a girl.’[4]

            By June, 1894 Annie Luker was declared to be a ‘Lady Diver, Champion of the World’.[5] She had quickly become part of a twelve hour continuous show at the Royal Aquarium which was declared to have ‘The Greatest Shows and the Biggest Shillings Worth’.[6] Annie had become part of the Aquariums eclectic mix of variety shows in that she shared the June, 1894 billing with: a boxing kangaroo, a talking horse, performing dogs, as well as comedians, singers, acrobats, ventriloquists, conjurors and dancers. The entertainments were declared to be ‘Unprecedented for Magnitude, Variety and Magnificence’ and ‘free’ once having paid one-shilling for entrance into the large Aquarium building.[7] The swimming feats were provided at 6 pm and 10 pm and included Annie Luker’s champion head dive, Baume’s great Monte Cristo sack feat, and Ben Fuller’s Great Dive through the roof.
            Miss Luker was still appearing in her high diving act in 1900 at the London Royal Aquarium without a break in service since her first dive six years before in January, 1894.[8] She had dived with some of the most notable male divers in the world: Mr James Finney, Mr Ben Fuller and ‘Baume’, all of which had not simply dived from a great height into a shallow tank, but had also been variously set alight, been tied up in a sack or simply dived from the roof. Such feats were performed in the name of entertainment and in order to further sensationalise what was already a most dangerous feat to perform. Such a circumstance begs the question was Annie Luker any less well thought of in performing her head-long dive or was the fact that she was a female enough to set her apart from the rest of her gender and thus allow her to join an elite group of divers. In September, 1900 the Southern Counties Amateur Swimming Association confirmed that the recent ladies swimming races would be ratified in accordance with their rules. The Perseverance Ladies SC had held a challenge race for London ladies with the outcome that Miss Smith of Berry Ladies SC was confirmed as the winner. The results had been questioned simply because the gala had contained an exhibition of ornamental swimming conducted by the professional swimmer Miss Annie Luker, Miss Lake and Baby May who all ‘showed what could be done in the ornamental way.’[9]




[1] The Penny Illustrated Paper and Illustrated Times, Miss Annie Luker, Saturday, January 27, 1894, 57.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid.
[5] The Graphic, Advertisements and Notices, Saturday, June 16, 1894.
[6] The Graphic, Advertisements and Notices, Saturday, September 15, 1894.
[7] Ibid.
[8] The Graphic, Advertisements and Notices, Saturday, January 27, 1900.
[9] The Penny Illustrated Paper and Illustrated Times, Cross-Channel Swimming, Saturday, September 15, 1900, 165.

Miss Agnes Beckwith
            Agnes Beckwith, the ‘pioneer of lady swimmers’ was a supreme champion swimmer and natationist who not only promoted the art of swimming but also pioneered the notion of swimming as a competitive sport for females. She was but one member of a swimming dynasty that provided aquatic entertainments in a variety of venues throughout the second half of the nineteenth-century. The Patriarch, Professor of swimming, Frederick Edward Beckwith, had been a successful speed swimmer as a young man and had moved to London in the early 1840s to seek his fortune as an entertainments promoter and natationist. [1] It is hardly surprising that given the support and protection afforded by the Beckwith Family that Agnes was able to develop her obvious natural abilities as a swimmer within the flourishing new leisure world of the late-Victorian period. Agnes had been introduced into the family business at an early age; in 1873 she had accompanied her father and one of her older brothers, Charles, to perform at the opening of the free open-air swimming baths in Derby. Local MP, Mr Michael Thomas Bass had presented the town of Derby with both the land and the baths; he was said to have ‘taken an interest in the little girl’ and proceeded to make a collection for Agnes raising two guineas for her performance.[2]
            In August, 1874 Professor Beckwith was pushing back the barriers to female involvement by hiring Lambeth Baths for ‘two monster Swimming Fetes, for Ladies as well as Gentlemen’.[3] The Professor had arranged for ‘five of the greatest lady swimmers in England’ to perform/race for £30 in prize money. The public were assured of the utmost probity in that the ladies were to wear ‘University Costume’. The price of admission was set at either one- or two-shillings as no expense had been spared to make Lambeth Baths ‘suitable for these great events.’[4] There was clearly a conscious effort being made to ensure that such events were seen to be ‘respectable’ with the insistence on specific costumes being worn and the setting of an entrance fee that would permit only ‘gentlefolk’ of either gender to witness the entertainment.
            In 1875 Professor Beckwith had introduced his 14 year old daughter to the general public when Agnes gave an exhibition of long-distance swimming in the River Thames. This publicity stunt guaranteed his protégée celebrity status from this point on in her professional career and certainly acted as a focus when publicising the family’s aquatic entertainments for the rest of the nineteenth-century. Agnes was described as a ‘professional swimmer’ at the age of fourteen by the New York Times who reported her solo effort of swimming from London Bridge to Greenwich, a distance of five miles.[5] The added interest to this episode was that some days later Miss Emily Parker succeeded in swimming from London Bridge to Blackwall, a distance of seven miles. Such competitions typified this age of professional ‘swimming challenges’ and was significant because the challengers were such young female professional swimmers.[6]  As with Agnes, Emily also came from a famous swimming family who were attempting to profit from long-distance swimming challenges, ‘the mania of the hour’. The Graphic newspaper reported both exhibitions of long-distance swimming as admirable as they exemplified the young ladies endurance and skill but caustically added, ‘we hardly like young ladies indulging in this public exhibition of their natatory abilities.’[7] However, this was not a universal view held by the media as The Penny Illustrated Paper reported that the events:
… should make swimming popular enough among the girls. Clad in such tasteful costumes de bain [bath] as these young lassies, both under fifteen years of age, wore during their river swims, young ladies ought to be able to enjoy bathing at the seaside far more than they do in the ugly gowns custom makes them wear.[8]
In 1876 there was speculation that Agnes would attempt to swim the English Channel but this only served to keep her name in the public spotlight. Her efforts were now attracting a mixed response from the media:
Ladies who would learn to swim, take lessons of Miss Beckwith! Miss Agnes, now you have given such ample proofs that you are a duck of a girl, stick to your proper vocation – that of teaching your sex to swim.[9]
            What newspaper commentators on such exhibitions failed to appreciate was that Agnes was a professional swimmer who had a living to make by plying her trade in all forms of natation open to her. Her gender and professional standing would not be allowed to interfere in her ability to entertain the general public and to be paid an income commensurate with such sporting activities. In 1878 Agnes continued her mastery of the River Thames by swimming twenty-miles of its length from Westminster Bridge to the Pigeons at Richmond and back with the tide to Mortlake. The reporter from The Penny Illustrated Paper was now referring to the ‘sweet seventeen’ year-old Miss Beckwith as the ‘Lambeth naiad’ who ‘swims twenty miles with wondrous ease in the Thames.’[10] Undoubtedly such exploits served to popularise ‘the art of swimming’ amongst ladies in general and gradually enable ladies-only sessions in public baths to be common place in the 1890s. But, for now, female swimmers had to satisfy themselves with access to ladies-only sessions in a minority of baths who had acknowledged the demand from a significant minority of female natationists.




[1] See David Day, The ‘Beckwith Frogs’, History Workshop Journal, Issue 71, February 25, 2011.
[2] The Derby Mercury, Opening of the Free Public Baths, Derby, Wednesday, June 18, 1873.
[3] The Era, Professor Beckwith, Sunday, August 23, 1874.
[4] Ibid.
[5] New York Times, A Lady’s Seven Miles’ Swim, September 20, 1875, 5
[6] See Christopher Love, ‘Social Class and the Swimming World: Amateurs and Professionals’, International Journal of the History of Sport, 24, No.5, 2007, 603-619
[7] The Graphic, Swimming, Saturday, September 11, 1875
[8] The Penny Illustrated Paper, The Swimming Feats of Miss Beckwith and Miss Parker, Saturday, September 11, 1875, 174.
[9] The Penny Illustrated Paper, Followers of Captain Webb, Saturday, July 08, 1876, 23.
[10] The Penny Illustrated Paper, Saturday, July 27, 1878, 61.

Miss Ada Webb

            Miss Ada Webb was both a natationist and acrobat who had the foresight to turn to theatrical management as she got older and less able to perform. Her performances in water were limited to that of ornamental swimming as part of a variety show either on stage in music halls or in a circus ring. During the August Bank Holiday period in 1887 Ada appeared at the Alexandra Palace entertaining some 18,000 visitors with her underwater feats that day.[1] The spectators for such entertainments were often hard to please but Ada appears to have found favour with her audiences. A commentary on events at the Washington Theatre for May, 1888 provides an insight into the type of acts that were popular with their patrons and also just how hard it was to please them. The musical introduction by Mr English, a comic singer and actor, was said to be over long and he had to ‘work hard’ in order to gain the audiences plaudits. A less inviting spectacle was a boy climbing a pole balanced on the shoulder of a Japanese man. The crowd were ‘better pleased’ by the feats of Miss Ada Webb who was described as a ‘young nageuse [swimmer]’ who ‘displayed her graceful form in some tank evolutions.’ Her deeds involved eating and drinking underwater followed by ‘various other feats requiring endurance and aptitude, and gained an encouraging reception.’[2]
            In a summary of the major acts performing within London Music Halls in 1888, Miss Webb warranted mention immediately after a description of the internationally renowned singer, Miss Marie Lloyd. Ada was described thus:
Miss Ada Webb shares with Britannia the title of “Empress of the Sea”. She has dived into the sea from a height of fifty-six feet, and therefore claims the distinction of being the champion lady diver of the world. Her underwater feats in the tank are those to which music hall audiences have become accustomed, and her symmetrical form lends grace and attractiveness to her various posings in the crystal tank.[3]
Ornamental swimmers were very popular with music hall audiences throughout the 1870-1910 periods and, as a consequence, females had the potential to make a very good living on the music hall circuit.
            In September 1890 it was revealed that Ada had saved the lives of three ladies who had got into trouble in the Bromley Swimming Baths. The Royal Humane Society was to award a ‘testimonial’ at the Tivoli Theatre where she was currently appearing. The account of the event was short on detail and possibly designed to promote the career of Ada perhaps? It would appear that Ada had dived into the pool fully clothed and saved three ‘exhausted’ ladies from possibly drowning. One of the ladies, we are informed has only just recovered from ‘the effects of immersion’ and had recently sent a cheque to Ada for the purchase of a new dress.[4] Such feats of bravery appear to have been rather commonplace with professional natationists who were not only described as being mystical creatures but also heroines.
            As an illustration of just how important it was for swimming clubs to provide other forms of entertainment at their swimming galas other than the races, the St. George’s Swimming Club, Sunderland had obtained the services of Ada Webb in October, 1891. She was appearing at the local People’s Palace and with the permission of the music hall’s proprietors, was allowed to give an exhibition at the club’s annual gala to be held at the Corporation Baths. In return for providing the gala with such a major coup as the services of Miss Webb, the members and officials of all the town’s swimming clubs provided the music hall proprietors with a ‘complimentary benefit’ evening.[5]
            For the 1892 season Ada had enlisted the assistance of another ornamental swimmer in her act. Miss Elsie Le-Bert was a younger swimmer who would help maintain an interest in the feats undertaken within the ‘crystal tank’.[6] In January, 1895 Miss Webb, ‘Queen of the Crystal Tank’ was appearing at Oldham, Lancashire in Ohmy’s Circus with her ‘Troupe of Charming Lady Swimmers’.[7] The names of ‘Florence, Louis and Elba’ appear as ‘the smartest aerial act in the world’.[8] Ada appears to have created a troupe of performers under her name that could perform both in the water and in the air. Her popularity was such that in April, 1895 Ada and her troupe were heading the bill with the Transfield’s Circus in Limerick, Ireland.[9]


[1] Lloyd’s Weekly News, Bank Holiday Amusements, Sunday, August 7, 1887
[2] The Era, The London Music Halls, The Washington Theatre, Saturday, May 19, 1888.
[3] The Era, The London Music Halls, Saturday, November 10, 1888.
[4] The Era, Music Hall Gossip, Miss Ada Webb, Saturday, September 20, 1890.
[5] The Era, Amusements in Sunderland, People’s Palace, Saturday, October 31, 1891.
[6] The Era, Amusements in Leeds, Princess’s Palace, Saturday, May 21, 1892
[7] The name ‘Ohmy’ came from the owners tight rope act at Raikes Hall Pleasure Gardens, Blackpool when the crowd would exclaim, oh my! This exclamation gave him (name not known) the name for his circus.
[8] The Era, Advertisements and Notices, Saturday, January 5, 1895.
[9] The Era, Provincial Theatricals, Limerick, Saturday, April 13, 1895.